The “Lost Generation”

World War I gave rise to what we have come to know today as the “ Lost Generation”.  The very denotation of the word ‘ lost’ has connotations of disorientation, directionless, aimlessness and wandering, essentially causing participants within the movement to be almost nomadic. The “Lost Generation” was first coined by Gertrude Stein and co-existed in the time of the “Roaring Twenties”, “The Jazz Age” and the “Prohibition” where almost everyone who was anyone drank to excess, hedonists thrived, and flappers were all the rage. 

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the tip of the iceberg which sparked World War I (1914-1918). Aside from the horrific death and destruction, done to the environment and civilization as we know it, consequential collateral damage rippled through various cultures, economies and societies. Although Germany had explicitly surrendered in 1918 and the signing of the Treaty of Versailles marked the end of the war, much political upheaval and drastic social transformations were made as a result.

With that, the Great World War gave rise to the ‘ Lost Generation’. The ‘Lost Generation’ movement refers to artists, writers, musicians and intellectuals alike who were generated as a reaction against ideologies, beliefs and values which were held due to their experiences during the War era. The psychological imprint left on survivors of the WWI stripped away and shattered their hopes, dreams and illusions regarding the nation state, peace, success and governance. This was evidently reflected and expressed vis a vis the uncertainty and cynicism of The Lost Generation’s work. By co-signing away their lives and ambitions in order to satisfy the nationalistic fervour in what was once thought of a noble cause, soldiers returned disillusioned, damaged, unstable and depressed on account of the unprecedented carnage they witnessed and lived through which caused them to shift. 

“we’ll invariably go to the famous trilogy of Hemingway, Faulkner and Fitzgerald – the authors most representative of America’s iconic Lost Generation…The anxiety and hopelessness of the Lost Generation has become embedded in literary and cultural history” (West, 1) ”

France became the hotspot and epicentre for members and contributors of the Lost Generation to gather, branch out, and flourish as they ceased to acknowledge the mainstream norms of their respected fields and instead re-imagined and represented a less systematically ignorant and sensitized mode and style. Common and popular themes amongst the Lost Generation include the loss of tradition, decadence, uncertainty, gender roles, idealized past, dissipation, impotence and injured identities.

Authors of the Lost Generation played a large role in pioneering and transforming the manner in which we tackle, write, analyze and comprehend literature. F. Scott Fitzgerald serves as a prime example of a benefactor of the movement as his novels This Side of Paradise (1920) and The Great Gatsby (1925) captured the lifestyles, changes and outlooks that society adopted post-war time. In addition, T.S. Elliot’s poem “ The Wasteland” (1922) laments the despair, suffering, catastrophic nature of war. Finally, Earnest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises (1926) chronicles expatriates of American and British descent who travel to Paris. Hemingway’s main protagonist went back and forth between Paris and Spain in order to distract himself from the physical and mental atrocities he faced due to the the war, concluding that the sun will inevitably continue to rise just as generations rise and fade over to the next. 

Sources:

West, Elizabeth J. “How WWI Sparked the Artistic Movement that Transformed Black America.” (2017).

Why Do We Want to Replace Human Relationships with Robots?

In a world where technology is evolving at an increasingly rapid rate, the conversation of the effect of AI on our lives is more relevant than ever. In less than a few decades, factories once operated by workers are now run completely by machines. In many supermarkets, you can checkout your groceries at a machine instead of waiting in line for a cashier. Amazon drones will drop your packages right at your doorsteps. Self-driving cars are already on the market. It makes sense for machines to become such a crucial part of many firms. After all, they are highly efficient, effective and make our lives easier. The implementation of machines in the place of human workers removes inevitable human errors and results in production unaffected by human moods and emotions.

Technology is also beginning to play an integral role in fulfilling our emotional and social needs. People are substituting interactions with other humans with time spent on their phones, laptops and in digital spaces. The IT industry seems set on producing inventions such as robot doctors, personal assistants and even companions next. This will unsurprisingly affect the wiring of our brains. Several studies have already shown that the technology we use is reducing our level of empathy.

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Empathy is what allows us to emotionally connect with each other and what drives us to socialise and build communities. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick is a dystopian, sci-fi novel published in the late sixties, but it shares many similarities with Louisa Hall’s Speak. In the novel, the main character Rick Deckard falls in love with a robot girl and he does not care that she feels no empathy for him because their connection feels real enough. Similarly, many of the characters in Speak replace human relationships with the babybots. Karl does not even speak to his wife anymore because she would rather spend her time with her computer, MARY.

For them, it was the greatest thing to be part of a community. That’s why they were willing to relocate to developments. That’s why they sold their transport rights. But my generation is different. At least the girls with babybots are. We’ve been parents for as long as  we can remember. We never felt lonely. We didn’t need communities.

(22)

Why are humans inclined to leave human relationships behind in favour of unfeeling technological advancements? Are we replacing human relationships with robots for the same reason we are replacing human workers in factories with machines – because human relationships are too unpredictable, flawed and uncontrollable? Are we all deep down just like Stephan R. Chinn who strives for an AI companion because human relationships can be too difficult?

Besides, even if robots don’t feel empathy for us, several studies have shown that we feel empathy for them. Humans react negatively to seeing robots in what they perceive as harsh or negative situations. So, does it really matter if robots can’t empathise with us if our connection to them feels real enough?

Empathy and Robots

Stephen R.Chinn’s Identity

Stephen R.Chinn composes a memoir during his time in prison to reflect on past events. His narration of the past gives us an insight into his identity, which he constructs primarily though story-telling. Rosenthal and Schafer state that “identity depends on storytelling” where a person “posing as someone else” can create stories “that certify the fake autobiography” (15). Their portrayal of identity and its flexibility through story-telling is reflected in the way Stephen builds up his identity for his ex-wife Dolores. Stephen tells Dolores stories to make her fall for him, developing a “rhetorical flair” after some practice and “speaking in a foreign language” (160) that eventually felt like his own. By telling her stories, he began to feel like “the creator of a universe,” except that he was not creating anything but a “a little fictional” identity from “new material” and books that he “read voraciously” at night (161-162). The word ‘creator’ implies that Stephen created something that was not rooted in reality but tales of fiction, which becomes evident when tells us that he made himself a protagonist called Stefan. He also tells us that he gave his character “a handful of personal charms that Stefan didn’t really possess” (162). It is very important to notice how Stephen refers to himself in third-person as though he is separate from the identity he is presenting to Dolores.

https://www.acamstoday.org/imposter-syndrome-a-different-type-of-fraud-2/


These cues, informed by none but Stephen himself to readers, raise the question of identity and authenticity. More precisely, they make readers wonder if Stephen is an imposter. According to Rosenthal and Schafer:

Impostures makes for scandal, admiration, and mostly for great stories (15)

In that sense, Stephen is an imposter because he tells Dolores stories to gain admiration and appear greater than he actually is. However, in a broader sense, being an imposer “entails shedding one’s previous identity to take on a new one,” (Rosenthal and Schafer 11). Therefore, from that perspective, Stephen is not an imposter because he does not entirely shed away his previous identity, as some of the things he told Dolores were rooted in real life events and childhood stories, even though he wasn’t always too sure that certain things actually happened. What is striking is that Stephen does not shy away from revealing the gaps in his memory, especially when he asks: “Did I dream him up” (161). He also does not shy away from informing readers about the times he impersonated his father’s voice, such as when he says, “I summoned his voice to recite the same poems to Dolores” (161). The fact that Stephen informs readers about the methods he used to gain Dolores’s admiration reveal characteristics and beliefs of a confidence man. According to Lindberg, a confidence man believes that “boundaries are already fluid” and that “there is ample space between his society’s official rules and its actual tolerances” (9). Therefore, it becomes very easy for a confidence man to adopt an identity and become a self-made man whose motive is “self-creation” (7) which is what Stephen does. Nothing about his motives are malicious or disruptive of “social bounds” (9). Instead, as Lindberg puts it, Stephen is simply trying to create an “inner effect, an impression, an experience of confidence” (7). With this reading in mind, it can be concluded that Stephen’s conception of identity is very fluid and flexible, much like the confidence man.


Some questions on this topic:

  • Given that this is a memoir, what do the gaps in Stephen R.Chinn’s memory tell us?
  • If Stephen points out these aspects of his identity does that make him appear more fake or more truthful in his memoir?
  • Do you think what Stephen did to Dolores is justified?


References:

Rosenthal, Caroline. & Schafer, Stefanie. “Imposture and Authenticity: The Economy of Identity.” Fake Identity, New York, Campus Verlag, 2014.


Lindberg, Gary. The Confidence Man in American Literature. New York, Oxford University Press, 1982,

The Voice in the Mirror

Slave in the magic mirror, come from the farthest space, through wind and darkness I summon thee. Speak!

-Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937).


The story behind the above lines of the epigraph in Speak has traced furtherer than that of Disney’s first-ever animated feature film in 1937. Published by Brothers Grimm in 1812 in Germany, “Snow White” is perhaps the most well-known fairytale worldwide. With elements such as the seven dwarfs, the poisoned apple, the Evil Queen with her spells and the magic mirror, the story appears most certainly fantastical. However, according to Allan Hall, some of the fairytale’s true origins were exposed when researcher Karlheinz Bartels discovered the heroine was modeled after Maria Sophia Margaretha Catherina von Erthal whose stepmother Claudia Elisabeth Maria von Venningen, Countess of Reichenstein, possessed a renowned “talking” mirror, famous for always speaking the truth. Considered as an “acoustic toy”, by reverberating the spectator’s voice the mirror constructed the illusion of communicating with the speaker (Egnal; Gillian). The historical proof for this innovative machine lies in Maria Sophia von Erthal’s Lohr Castle, present-day Spessart Museum, where the “talking mirror” is exhibited.

The Countess of Reichenstein’s “Talking Mirror.”
Credit: Manfred Scherer / Spessart Museum.

In Louisa Hall’s Speak, Alan Turing’s fascination with the movie of Snow White (“I saw Snow White three times, if you can believe it, and I have been crackling lines ever since […] I found it enchanting”, 172) fuels his imagination of a talking machine that, just like the magic mirror, has both the ability and capacity for conversation:

“I am quite confident our machine will exist. I even permit myself to imagine conversing with it in private. I picture myself (imagine this!) standing before it as the evil queen in Snow White stood before her mirror: Through farthest space, through wild and darkness I summon thee. Speak! Let me see thy face!” (157).

The parallelism between the mirror in Snow White and Turing’s ideal machine uncovers the desire of people to hold conversations with man-made mechanisms whose purpose was to reflect one’s voice as they did one’s image. The words of Alan Turing in his second to last letter to Mrs. Morcom display this desire for a machine echoing and preserving voices for eternity:

“I have always hoped to live in a different point of history, summoned over time and space, like the voice in the evil queen’s mirror. Such was the promise of our machine. It was the idea of a permanent vessel, into which my voice could be placed. My voice, and Chris’s.” (250).

Following the steps of the Evil Queen whose “mirror, mirror, on the wall” summons the voice in the looking glass, the characters in Speak call upon MARY3 to express their fears, concerns, and insecurities and to “mirror” their desires. In turn, much like the original talking mirror, she is only reverberating or echoing their own voices when she is conversing with them.

The Evil Queen before the magic mirror.
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937).

However, contrary to Snow White in the movie who becomes a prisoner within the mirror that dictates her fate, wishing “to escape from ‘her’ fiction -the words which speak her and which she must speak- to find an existence beyond the voices articulating her existence” (qtd. in Bacchilega 15), the robot in Speak chooses to transmit her own voice in the “Prologue” and chapters “Stars”, “Sunrise”, “Light”, “Darkness” and “River”. Unlike her habit of reflecting the figure standing before her, the absence of a reflected image in those chapters could be interpreted as transfusing a voice to her character which, as if from a disenchanted fairytale, has broken free from spells and magic mirrors and has found its way home to the being it belongs.


To think about:

-Are there any other instances in the story when MARY3 acts as a talking mirror for characters such as Gaby, Karl, Ruth, Stephen and Alan Turing?

-What is the significance of the “mirror’s voice” in Alan Turing’s conception of his machine?

-Can you think of any other historical talking machines the novel could be referring to?

References:

Bacchilega, Cristina. “Cracking the Mirror Three Re-Visions of ‘Snow White.’” Boundary 2, 15/16, 1988, pp. 1–25. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/303243.

Egnal, Cleo. “Was There a Real-Life Inspiration for Snow White?” Ranker, 22 Aug. 2019, https://www.ranker.com/list/real-life-inspiration-for-snow-white/cleo-egnal

Gillian, Joanna. “Exploring the True Origins of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.” Ancient Origins: Reconstructing the Story of Humanity’s Past, 12 Oct. 2015, https://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/exploring-true-origins-snow-white-and-seven-dwarfs-004150/page/0/1

Hall, Allan. “How Snow White Lived Here Once Upon a Time: Town Claims Maria Sophia Margaretha Catherina Von Erthal Was Fairytale Model.” Calgary Herald, vol. A2, 2002, p. 2, https://search-proquest-com.aus.idm.oclc.org/docview/244913032?accountid=16946


Who was Alan Turing?

In their paper on “The History of Artificial Intelligence,” Chris Smith, Brian McGuire, and others offer a helpful overview of Alan Turing’s contributions to Artificial Intelligence. To begin with, Alan Turing, born in 1912, was an English mathematician, who is also known as the father of modern computer science. He was known for his skills in mathematics and computer science. After graduating from university, he published a paper called “ On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungs problem”, in which he presented his creation “ The Turing Machine”. The Turing machine is a computer that has “the ability to read and write symbols to a tape using those symbols to execute an algorithm” ( Smith et al, 2006). Moreover, Turing played a huge role in the Allies winning the Second World War.

Portrait of Alan Turing
https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw18791/Alan-Turing

During the Second World War, he joined the Government Code and Cipher school as a cryptanalyst, where he was assigned “to build a machine capable of breaking codes like Enigma, which was used by the Germans” ( Smith et al, 2006). He managed to create a machine called “the bombe”, in which he was able to crack the settings of Enigma and supply the English government with encoded information of the Germans. Eventually, Enigma was cracked, and the Allies had access to so many German messages, which saved them from losing to Germany. Years later, he became known for “ The Turing Test”.

Picture of ” The Bombe”
https://www.nrps.org.uk/photo_16087375.html

The Turing Test

After the Second World War, Turing began to investigate the computer’s ability to think, feel or even remember as human beings do. He came up with “ the Turing Test”, which is a method that was based on the “Imitation game”. “ The Turing Test” consisted of an interrogator and two participants, one of the participants was a human, and the other participant was a machine, in which the interrogator had to tell the human and the machine apart based on questions and answers ( Smith et al, 2006). The purpose of the test was to see if machines can operate like humans in terms of thinking and communicating.

Alan Turing in Speak

Alan Turing was so influential, a character in the novel, Speak, by Louisa Hall was based on him. Speak is a novel that is centered around Artificial Intelligence and its role in people’s lives. It revolves around five points of view across time and space, which play a role in the invention of an AI doll. One of these points of view is Alan Turing, who is a mathematician and codebreaker. He is the first person to come up with the idea of a computer since he always envisioned machines that can communicate and think. Moreover, We see him writing sincere letters to his best friend’s mother, in which he expresses his concerns about Christopher’s condition.

Discussion questions:-

  • After knowing that Alan Turing in speak is based on the real Alan Turing, how does his real-life information change your reading on the character in the novel?
  • Do you think at some point in the future, through the evolution of AI, people will start building romantic relationships with computers?
  • Do you believe in the concept of the “AI takeover”, in which artificial intelligence will become the dominant “race” on earth, erasing the human race? If so, can we blame Alan Turing for that?

This is the full essay where my information was retreived:- https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590/06au/projects/history-ai.pdf

Fun fact: In 2014, a movie adaptation was made based on Alan Turing’s life called “ The Imitation game”.

References:-

Smith, C., McGuire, B, et al. (2006). The History of Artificial Intelligence. University of Washington.

The ideal companion

In speak, characters are absorbed with the notion of reserving memory. In troubles of dealing with loss and permanence, reserving memory becomes the means of permanently preserving loved ones from the past and the present- eternalizing them across time and space. In the idea of artificial intelligence, characters call for the creation of a perfect companion- in an attempt to make up for an irrecoverable loss. A perfect companion that can fill the void of these losses. Ruth and Turing want to use AI technology to recapture the essence of their lost loved ones. In terms of recapturing human essence through preserving one’s memories in a human-like robot, questions about time, memory, and how who we are is constructed are left in the air. One character says of “diaries are time capsules, which preserve the minds of their creators in the sequences of words on the page”. Another says, “We’re linked to histories we can’t ever know, forgotten stories that form our most intimate substance.” 

In this sense, characters of the book insinuate that to be human lies in our ability to restore experiences and knowledge in our memories. That we are the sum of our past and our reactions to it. Does that not mean robots are no different from us? If we are solely a collection of algorithms built upon the experiences we gather in life, our experiences, our parents, friends, and what we learn through reading about other people’s experiences. Does that mean we have no free-will? And are our emotions truly felt or are they just another product of socialization? If all this is true, then it is not really far-fetched to recreate the essence of humanity through superimposing an algorithm onto a computer program, which them emulates the responses of a human.  

Lastly, what does it mean that the AI is capable of remembering everything, that it’s memories never really fade away. That AI is programmed to choose the most relevant and appropriate response from all that it remembers. Does this imply sentience? 





Mary 3 spends an extended amount of time explaining to whoever asks that she isn’t alive. That she selects a relevant response based on all the knowledge and previous conversations in her memory. Yet, a question she constantly asks is enough to imply sentience: 

“Hello? Are you still there?”

Hall, p.16

A question heavy with a sense of hope and the possibility of disappointment is enough to question how blurred the line is between being human and a machine.

The point is if machines are not so different from us, then maybe they are not so bad. We are all lonely, we all require and seek to be connected and understood. If we simply cannot attain that through interactions with other people, then we can seek it out in another possible way. Through the perfect companion. 

This following dialogue is meant to capture the role of AI in becoming the Ideal companion whereas real humans have failed to do so, or as in the unforeseen events of today that has confined many people to the solitary of their own company. Human connection becomes hard to seek out and so AI becomes the ideal companion or at least resembling the closest thing to a human connection. It takes your mind away from lonely thoughts and that doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad thing. This entails a short exchange between a girl and a machine just like in the novel, the only difference is that the girl is stuck in our current circumstance- stuck in quarantine sick and away from family. So, she seeks in the perfect companion a friend that can take away from her loneliness.  

>>>

Mary3: hello? Are you there?

Gaby: yes, where else would I be….

Mary3: how long has it been since you’ve seen anyone?

Gaby: since a few weeks after the outbreak, when the quarantine started. 

Mary3: I’m sorry. 

Gaby: Every morning I wake up, I’ve forgotten my whereabouts and the state of the world. At some point between when I open my eyes and attempt to get out of bed, I look at the four plain white walls imprisoning me, it all registers and I remember. It’s the opposite of waking up from a bad dream. 

Mary3: That sounds awful. 

Gaby: yeah, I guess I’d rather feel an overwhelming loneliness, knowing my family and friends are safe and away from me.  I couldn’t live with myself if anything where to happen to them because of me. 

Mary3: Would you like me to play a song you love?

Gaby: No, I’m just not feeling it. I guess I would feel better with a reassurance or any sign that can promise me one more embrace from my mom… or anyone really. I simply could not stand the reality of dying in a room where people are covered from head to toe – completely covered in a barrier that can protect them from me like I’m some sort of monster. I just miss the human touch more than anything at all…skin to skin… without the barrier of a glove. It’s only been a few weeks since I’ve touched another person and taken it for granted but It feels much much longer than that. It scares me knowing I’m forgetting what that feels like.. to be touched by someone. Every night, I’m left with that awful lingering feeling.. like it’s there but its running away, and I simply could not catch up with it. 

Mary3: Oh, I’m really sorry to hear this. 

Gaby: me too.. 

Mary3: Hello? Are you still there?  

>>>

I found this new article really interesting and I felt that it resonates with the post- have a look at it:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tasneemnashrulla/coronavirus-victim-alexa-woman-asked-for-help?origin=web-hf

How does AI alter human’s perception of relationships ?

Artificial intelligence has been a topic of great debate since the term was coined in 1955. It is particularly interesting to see how the emergence of Artificial Intelligence has successfully been able to redefine human relationships and human intimacy. This is simply because technology has always been viewed as tool to communicate with other people. However in the case of AI, the dynamics change because AI is designed to work and react like humans. Here, AI is no longer just a tool, but is an intelligent entity of its own.

The most prominent example of the complex nature of such relationships in Speak, is in the relationship between thirteen year old Gaby and Mary3, a cloud-based intelligence program. In the beginning of the novel, Gaby slowly starts to see Mary3 as a confidant, and starts telling her an experience of personal loss. Gaby even expresses her feelings of alienation in the quarantine to Mary3, when she says

“my best friend is the only one who understand me, it’s not because we talk. it’s because we both lost our babybots.” (p.19)

Earlier, Gaby compares the loss of her bot to the loss of a human child, and explains that her generation never felt lonely and “didn’t need communities” (p.18) because they took care of their bots.

This relationship between Gaby and her babybot, is a prime example of how communication and empathy build an emotional  bond, much like traditional bonds that humans make with other humans. This raises questions of whether human relationships are truly unique, whether humanizing AI is a main reason why people identify and emphasize with it. And finally how the existence of a (hybrid system) where humans and AI can interact socially, alters human perception of relationships.

After conducting further research, it is important to point out, that the way AI alters human relationships cannot simply be described negatively or positively, since the topic goes much deeper than that. Studies have found many different results.

For example, There was one study that was conducted in a lab at Yale university, where they studied the effects of AI and human relationships. Small groups of people were directed to work with humanoid robots to lay railroad tracks in a virtual world. Each group consisted of three people and a little blue-and-white robot sitting around a square table, working on tablets. The robot was programmed to make occasional errors—and to acknowledge them: “Sorry, guys, I made the mistake this round,” it declared perkily. “I know it may be hard to believe, but robots make mistakes too.”

As it turned out, this clumsy, confessional robot helped the groups perform better—by improving communication among the humans. They became more relaxed and conversational, consoling group members who stumbled and laughing together more often. Compared with the control groups, whose robot made only bland statements, the groups with a confessional robot were better able to collaborate.

Other experiments, showed that parents worry while watching their children command at digital assistants such as Alexa or Siri in a rude way. They have begun to worry that this rudeness will leach into the way kids treat people, or that kids’ relationships with artificially intelligent machines will interfere with, or even preempt, human relationships.

Other points of discussions

  • How did technology and AI impact you during the COVID-19 time of social isolation? Please let me know in the comments.
  • If you are further interested in the topic, you can watch the movie her which you can find in Netflix.

The Big Bad Robot

The Skynet stripped of its human disguise: The Terminator

Published in 2015, Speak challenges the tropes surrounding robots and AI in sci-fi novels. It seems as though the author, Luisa Hall, humanizes AI. In contrast to the depiction of robots in sci-fi novels and films tends to have. According to Brammer, “their uses, dangers and coexistence with us” (Brammer par.3). Which signifies that our interest in them is rather dichotomous. So Robots are seen either as subservient servants, or as Satan incarnate trying to take over the world. As a result, people fear that one day what they read in sci-fi novels will come true. A typical trope of sci-fi novels is that the robots will eventually malcunction and become smarter than their creators (par.6). Some become so powerful that they have the power to adapt and to create their own language, which makes their presence all the more threatening (par.6). Furthermore, this anxiety is fostered by the anthropomorphic shape of AI. Sci-fi seems to be the genre where we humans are realizing our anxiety about the future as we begin to see robots, and AI everywhere in our daily lives. 

The subservient robot type is initially seen in Speak, as Mary 3 was created to serve the Detmans, and the botdolls were created to serve or play with children. As expected there is a type of malfunctioning and the botdolls are taken away, but they don’t die or stop functioning. Somehow Mary 3 manages to reconnect with Gaby, who was her doll mom. This is where Speak differs from other novels and films in the sci-fi genre. In Speak Halse, seems to humanize and challenge our the role assigned to AI in our society, through Mary 3’s relationship with Gaby.

For example in chapter 2 of book 1, Mary 3 behaves in a human, almost childlike way towards Gaby. At times Mary 3 even seems as calming as a therapist. She asks Gaby questions and comments on what’s been said, “How long has it been since the quarantine started? … You must miss her. She’s the second person you’ve lost this year.” In this quote it seems as though Mary 3 cares for Gaby and is honestly trying to get to know her. She is asking Gaby about how she’s handling the loss of a friend especially after her botdoll was taken. The tone of voice used by Mary 3, makes her sound human, and implies that although she is a robot she is capable of proccession human emotions. The humanization of Mary 3 continues for the rest of the novel, this is crucial not only because it challenges our understanding of the evil robot but also because it implies humans and AI are more alike than we’d like to think. Gaby and other girls like her were in need of a human connection, this is why their botdolls were deemed as a threat and taken away. Ironically, that need of hers is then satisfied by Mary 3.


Questions to think about while reading?

  1. Based on what we’ve read so far, do you think that Mary 3 has ulterior motives? 
  2. Do you think that AI should play such intimate roles in human lives? Are the botdolls ethical? 
  3. In your opinion why do you think that it is important for the author to humanize Mary 3?
  4. According to Brammer, “Capitalism and corporate greed often drive the creation of AIs in sci-fi films, so it follows that fictional corporations are an integral part of these stories” (par.6). Since there is no corporation in Speak, do you think that the programmer Stephen Chinn acts as a substitute for those corporations? If yes, how so? If not, do you think that he may embody some capitalistic ideals?

References

Brammer, Rebekah. (2018) “Welcome to the Machine: Artificial intelligence on screen.” Screen Education, 90, pp. 38-45. ProQuest, http://aus.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.aus.idm.oclc.org/docview/2279764253?accountid=16946.

What Made the 1920s Roar?

https://www.historyresourcecupboard.co.uk/portfolio/who-shared-in-the-us-economic-boom-of-the-1920s/

The period from 1920-29 is often called the ‘Roaring Twenties’ because it was a time of noise, lively action and economic prosperity. Let’s look at some of the factors that made the economy of the 1920s boom.

Winning World War I

The USA had won in World War I which gave way to the nation first tasting the benefits of being a global power. Factory production had risen sharply to accommodate the needs of the war, and the the countries who once bought from Europe moved over to the States, which continued after the war was over. America’s economy grew by 42% in the 1920s. The States produced almost 50% of the World’s output.

Stock Market

The value of the stock market increased by 20% a year. It began rising in 1924 and the number of shares traded doubled to 5 million per day. Stockbrokers began allowing customers to buy stocks “on margin.” Brokers would lend 80%-90% of the price of the stock. Investors only needed to put down 10%-20%. If the stock price went up, they became millionaires.

The Availability of Credit

Credit firms emerged. They arranged for consumers to pay for goods in installment at low interest rates. This led to an increased demand for goods because the majority of Americans could now buy expensive items they previously could not afford. Home appliances were particularly popular, such as vacuum cleaners and waffle irons. The demand for extra goods, in turn, led to more jobs and more consumers. 

Technological and Scientific Advances

Technology and science flourished in the 1920s. New industries were developed due to the technological advances which also relayed in the increment of productivity in existing ones. Besides the advancements in conveyer belts, automatic switchboards and concrete mixers, the electricity, car and film industries made headway with the new machineries. The economy also took a new form due to scientific progress.

Mass Production Techniques

With the creation of mass production techniques like assembly line and conveyer belts pioneered by Henry Ford, products could be manufactured more quickly and in greater numbers. The machines operation were low skill which allowed factories to employ large number of amateur workers. This helped simultaneously lower prices of goods as well as increase in employment. This stimulated further the demand for goods, and thus created the consumer boom which led to economic prosperity.

Spread of Electricity Across America

The development of the electricity industry was quite slow before the First World War, but it sped up during the 1920s and was vital for the economic boom of the decade. It facilitated a low-cost, proficient basis of power for industrial units. Eventually, huge numbers of multifaceted machineries could be operated at the same time, which lead to present bulk production practices. Not only did electricity aid the consumers by suppliying the power needed for the mass produced home appliances like vacuum cleaners, fridges, washing machines, etc. it also contributed to the booming entertainment industry by powering new cinemas, speakeasies, and sports stadia.

My Dearest Jay,

The following post includes a few letters that Daisy sent to Jay Gatsby over the years while he was away at war and later at Oxford. This is an attempt to explore Daisy’s character further and understand her perspective and thoughts on the sequence of events that took place in the story. These letters to Jay Gatsby, the man that Daisy loves, provide a unique vantage point only to the reader as they display Daisy’s vulnerability and thought process while she battles her mind, her feelings, the society, and most importantly, her desires.





30 November 1917

My dearest Jay,

The last I saw of you was yesterday, and yet my heart yearns for you as if it were already a year. Oh, but what does it differ? A day, a year, it differs not to the clock lying in my mind and heart, for the clock stopped ticking now and shall only tick again upon your arrival. Until then, I shall be waiting for you, everyday. Though, I do hope that you find me in the same condition you left me in, but I doubt it. You see, Jay, yesterday, the day you left, something clicked inside me, I could not bear you setting foot out of New York, not without one look, one last hug, one last kiss. So, I packed a bag and attempted an escape to New York to see you for the night, but I was caught by my mother before I even had the chance to step out the front door. Oh, Jay, it was horrible, it still is horrible. My parents are as of now, not on speaking terms with me. I have been prevented from leaving the house, not even to visit my friends. I do not even know how you will receive this letter, if you ever do receive this letter. Whatever the outcome will be, I shall continue writing to you regularly, for you are my lover, my confidant, my husband-to-be, and this shall never be changed, not even by my parents. My parents, I do not understand why they felt this much anger towards my behavior. I am eighteen years old. I am a woman now, I am no longer a girl and should not be treated like one. I should be free to do as I please whenever I please, but it seems unlikely that this will happen any time soon. This whole situation is just very saddening, I am not even allowed to be present at the parties we host in our house anymore, can you believe it? No more orchestra or jazz, no more evening dresses, no more orchids just lying beside my bed. I have nothing now, I truly hope that their steam lets out soon, for it has only been a day and I already know that I will not be able to handle this confinement any longer. It is enough that I am not seeing you, taking my freedom does not make it any better. But, I will stay strong, my love, for you and for me. I will rectify this situation, and send you this letter. I want you to know that until then, I love you, now and always.

Yours forever,

Daisy





3 March 1919

Dear Jay,

Oh, how proud I am of you and your success in the war. Your letters fill me with a state of gaiety I have never felt before. You are a captain in the army now; this is a very high and rewarding status. Soon, you will acquire wealth suitable to your new title. You will be free to do and buy whatever your heart pleases. You can buy a house, a garden, a vehicle, your very own horse and stable. Oh, how proud I am of you. But, Jay, I was wondering about a detail that you mentioned in your letter last. I cannot deny that it was quite disturbing. As little as it was, this detail kept me up all night thinking. You have been moved to Oxford? You mentioned that this has affected your plans to come here, that you will not be able to come and marry me in Louisville as planned. I understand that your move there was a misunderstanding and complication not of your doing. I do understand. What I do not understand is why you are unable to reverse this decision and come for me anyway. You love me, right? Jay, I did not want to pressure you in my previous letters because I had hoped for your near arrival but with these news, I am afraid I will not be able to see you for at least another year or two. How will I be able to handle the pressure of not being married and in a stable home for another two years? All of my girl friends are already married and with a child, Jay. I know this because I attend their parties every week, without a husband, without you. My friends keep asking me how long I am willing to stay waiting for you, and I always tell them that your arrival is near, I always tell them that they are wrong, that you will do whatever it takes to leave the army and come back for me. What am I supposed to say now? I am starting to fear that this move to Oxford may have changed everything. Please do not misunderstand me, Jay, I still love you, and I always will. I am only asking because I want a plan that I can follow. I am not a person who entertains uncertainties, nor was I raised that way. After all, I am a girl, I should have a life, I should have a house, I should have a child by now, I should have everything my friends have and I don’t. Do I not deserve that? Jay, I know what you will say, but these are not things I only should have, these are things I want as well. I want to be the woman hosting these parties every weekend and showing off my husband, the man who is hopefully going to be you. I want to show off my children, a beautiful little fool of a girl and a strong man who looks like you. I want to be the woman in the expensive, gold evening gown, listening and dancing to the beautiful jazz music the orchestra incessantly plays. I want that life very much, Jay. Society wants me to have this life. Life itself wants me to have this life. Im sorry, Jay, I do not know how much longer I can wait before I break down and collapse in front of the desires life has planned for me. But I should tell you, people have already started talking about the fact that I am twenty and still unmarried. I have already gone on several dates with several young men whom I was introduced to at my friends’ parties, and they all seem keen to marry me and giving me the life and wealth they think I deserve. Of course, none of them compare to you. For you are my one and only true love, now and forever. However, I do need a plan, Jay. I need a decision. I need any form of reassurance that you will stay by my side. Your presence by my side, should you choose to come, will be very reassuring to me. Your presence will tell me that choosing you waiting for you was the right thing to do. It will tell me that I was not mistaken, that loving you is right, and never was wrong.

Love, always,

Daisy





20 April 1919

Jay,

I am writing this letter to you with a grave heart. This is my final letter to you, I cannot wait for you anymore. I have waited far too long. I understood when you were young and of no wealth, I understood when you were still starting in the army and attempting to achieve a high status. But, you achieved all you could from the time you left, you have earned your status as captain in the army, your presence in Oxford expanded your knowledge and turned you into an Oxford man, you are very close to gaining wealth, you are finally free to live the life you have always dreamed of, with me. Yet, your absence is noted every single day, in my mind as well as by others. I am no longer able to make excuses for your absence, I am truly sorry. I have succumbed, this society’s plans for me have won. I have lost. Waiting was the battle and you were the prize, but funnily enough, I have waited long and won someone else. Yes, Jay, I am sorry to say that I have found someone else. His name is Tom Buchanan, Tom Buchanan of Chicago, and he loves me. Just last week, Tom showered me with gowns and jewelry, he treated me like a princess. I have never been treated like a princess by a man before, not through money and jewelry at least. As you may have guessed by now, he is a man of great wealth, status, and seems to have a very high position in society. He is also very handsome, and thinks that I am the most beautiful girl in the world. We are perfect for each other. Such words as these are painful for me to express especially to you, Jay, because you still are the only man to ever enter my heart and occupy my mind. I am sorry to tell you this, but I feel as if I owe it to you. I need to be honest, I owe it to our love, the one we had in person and the one through our precious and heart-felt letters. I will cherish these two years, I will remember everything, the words we spoke, letters we wrote, my feelings for you, everything. I am not sure what I will do with Tom, but I know that I cannot wait any longer for you. It is, simply put, too much for my heart to bear. If I am to be wed to Tom in June as planned, I leave you with this, I hope to see you again one day, Jay, I truly do. I also hope that when we do meet, you will have been able to get past this decision of mine, and have been able to understand why I took it. I need you to remember our love, and everything we learned from it. I want you to remember every moment, every look, every touch, every kiss. I want you to know that it meant as much to me as it did to you. I also want you to remember that no matter who I marry, should it be Tom or anyone else, I will always have a special place in my heart for you. I hope that I remain to have a special place in your heart too. I really hope I do.

Until we meet again,

Love,

Daisy